Author: unifiedsocial (page 7 of 8)

How the Bones Brigade tweeted their way to 6-figure sales

Content originally written by Jonathan Strauss and published on the awe.sm blog

One of the coolest things about working at awe.sm (in addition to the team, and the view :D ) is seeing all the exciting things our customers are doing with our platform. That’s especially true of our friends at Topspin Media, who have made us a part of projects for some of our team’s favorite artists, like the Beastie BoysYeasayer, and in Tilly‘s case, Kreayshawn ;-). But for several of us, having what we’ve built be an integral part of the amazing and amazingly successful direct-to-fan release of the Bones Brigade documentary made our jobs cool to our 12 year-old selves.

image

Personal satisfaction aside, this project and the data that the filmmakers and Topspin will be sharing at Sundance this week are nothing short of a revolution in film distribution. If you’re into the business of content, you should read more about the overall release on Topspin’s blog. The quick summary is that through an innovative combination of viral marketing, well-designed windowing, and creatively tiered pricing the producers were able to build an email list from 0 to more than 46,000 fans in just 2 months and ultimately make nearly 4 times the money they were offered in a conventional distribution deal.

Sharing drove 10% of the total revenue from the release. And thanks to deep awe.sm integration excellently implemented by the experts at The Uprising Creative, we tracked the value generated by each individual Tweet and Facebook post. Measuring the ROI of sharing is what awe.sm was built to do, and we have fascinating data on conversions from sharing across our hundreds of customers. But the unprecedented transparency of the Bones Brigade filmmakers is allowing us for the first time to publicly share some of the incredible insights we deliver our customers everyday.

image

Topspin’s strategy was to use the existing fan-bases of the Bones Brigade members, including Tony Hawk’s 4.2m Facebook fans and 3.3m Twitter followers, to get the word out to the core most passionate fans first and then encourage those fans to spread the message to their friends. This approach was extremely successful in driving a significant volume of high-value traffic with an average value of $1.59 per visit ($2.11 per visit from sharing by the cast and $1.21 per visit from sharing by ordinary fans). Being able to track the value of each share and the relationships between shares gives you visibility into the mechanics of how and why sharing is effective and not just the end results. This is essential to understanding the patterns of success and how to replicate them.

Here are some of the most interesting patterns we observed in the Bones Brigade sharing data:

  • Fans were more than 7 times as likely to share to Facebook than to Twitter (87.8% of fans shared to Facebook vs 12.2% to Twitter);
  • The value per visit from a fan’s Facebook share was more than 2 times higher than that from a fan’s Twitter share ($1.29/visit from Facebook vs $0.60 from Twitter);
  • Sharing by the cast (i.e. “Celebrities”) was roughly even to both Facebook and Twitter but drove 82.0% of revenues from shares to Twitter and 18.0% from Facebook;
  • However, the value per visit from the cast’s shares to Facebook and Twitter was roughly equal ($1.93/visit from Facebook vs $2.07/visit from Twitter);
  • Sharing by the cast to Twitter drove more than twice as many visits per share as Facebook and more than 2.5 times the visits per fan/follower (1.10% eCTR for Facebook vs 2.82% eCTR for Twitter).

image

This stark contrast between the performance of sharing by celebrities vs ordinary fans across Facebook and Twitter demonstrates several underlying (and somewhat related) phenomena:

  • Normal people primarily use Twitter to discover content and Facebook to share it with friends – The overwhelming volume of fan sharing to Facebook (87.8%) clearly demonstrates that most people do not view Twitter as an important personal sharing channel, but the fact that Twitter was still able to drive 40.3% of the traffic and 47.3% of the revenue (primarily from celebrity sharing) shows that there is still a significant audience discovering and consuming content through Twitter despite their lack of sharing;
  • Twitter is a network of loose ties and Facebook is a network of strong ties – Visits driven by celebrities had roughly equivalent value across Facebook and Twitter while visits driven by regular fans were more than twice as valuable on Facebook than on Twitter, which demonstrates that consumers have tighter connections with and are more swayed by the recommendations of their friends on Facebook than by the non-celebrities they follow on Twitter;
  • Twitter followers are more likely to click than Facebook fans – Whether it’s an impact of NewsFeed Optimization or just a side-effect of the fact that normal people are primarily using Facebook to share with and consume from their friends and family, the numbers show that celebrity sharing to Twitter is driving over 2.5 times more visits per follower than sharing to Facebook is driving visits per fan with a roughly equal value per visit.

We’ll be taking a deeper look at each of these topics in upcoming blog posts. So follow @Unified on Twitter to learn more about this amazing campaign.

 

Introducing Competitive Streams: Monitor your competitors’ Facebook Pages in real-time


image

Today, we’re excited to introduce Competitive Streams, the fastest way to keep eyes on your competitors’ Facebook Pages in real-time. A brand new applet built on our PageLever Nowarchitecture, Competitive Streams allows our customers to instantly identify the most engaging posts from competitors’ Facebook Pages, using our unique Relative Impact Efficiency metric.

While most Competitive Analysis tools can only look at the past, Competitive Streams pulls in the most recent posts from competitors in real-time. Great Community Managers know that timing and recency is critical, and have been asking us for monitoring tools that keep up with their need to know exactly what their competitors are publishing, right when it’s published, instead of a day later.

Relative Impact Efficiency

Of course, when you’re monitoring a few dozen competitors, it can be tough to figure out which of their dozens of posts were most successful. That’s where Relative Impact Efficiency (RIE) comes in. Relative Impact Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of a Facebook Page Post, relative to what that Page typically receives.

Relative Impact Efficiency is calculated using a proprietary algorithm that takes into account key engagement metrics including Likes, Comments, Shares and People Talking About This (PTAT), as well as page size and typical engagement. Because Relative Impact Efficiency is relative to the Page, and not an absolute measure, it allows you to compare the performance of Posts from Pages of different sizes and different levels of engagement.

In Competitive Streams, you can sort your stream by Relative Impact Efficiency so that the most effective posts from your competitors bubble up to the top.

Competitive Streams in Action:

Beverage Brands

image

Holiday Retailers

image

News Organizations

image

We’re excited to see how our customers use Competitive Streams – if you’re already usingPageLever Now, you can start adding your competitors right away by logging in, navigating to one of your Pages and clicking on the Competitive Streams applet. We’d love to hear what you think.

If you’re not yet using PageLever, go ahead and signup here – you’ll be able to try PageLever risk-free and create a Competitive Stream right away.

 

Fact Check: Why Mark Cuban is wrong about Facebook

Yesterday, the internet went ablaze with yet another round of hoopla surrounding changes to Organic Reach for Pages, this time because of quotes from Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban published on Read Write Web.

In the article, Cuban complains that in order for one of his companies’ Pages’ Posts to reach one million people on Facebook, his companies must pay roughly $3,000 – a sum that Cuban finds outrageous. Cuban claims to have shifted his companies’ marketing strategies to Twitter and Tumblr as the “primary” sites for the businesses he’s invested in, and rely less on Facebook.

Hey Mark Cuban, Let’s Do Some Math

Let’s use Cuban’s example – $3,000 to reach one million people:

M Cuban big screen shot Fact Check: Why Mark Cuban is wrong about Facebook

$3,000 / 1,000,000 people = $0.003 per person

225px 2005 Penny Uncirculated Obverse cropped Fact Check: Why Mark Cuban is wrong about Facebook

Reality Check:

Mark Cuban is complaining about having to spend less than a penny per fan.

Just 1/3rd of one cent to reach each fan of the Dallas Mavericks. In advertising terminology, where we measure “per-mille” (per-thousand), that’s a $3 per 1,000 people reached. Is it not worth $0.003 to reach a fan? Is it not worth $0.30 to reach them 100 times?

Mr. Cuban seems to be having a tough time seeing this as a bargain, so let’s connect the dots and see how it impacts the bottom-line.

Every year, the Dallas Mavericks organization has to let their fans know when single game tickets go on sale, and where to buy them online. For any NBA team, selling tickets is themost important part of making money in both the short-term and long-term.

The average price of a ticket to a Dallas Mavericks game is roughly $62.1.

Is it not worth paying $0.003 cents per fan to remind them to buy tickets? To seed a video of Dirk Nowitzki’s game winning shot (to get people to come to the game)? To tell fans where to buy the latest throwback jersey? As Ed Lover would say…

cmon son Fact Check: Why Mark Cuban is wrong about Facebook

Mark Cuban, you can afford $0.003 per fan to increase Mavs home game attendance. C’mon son!

Organic Reach isn’t a fixed number!

Cuban states that having Pages reach 100% of their fans is “common sense”, and presents his case as if Facebook is putting a fixed cap on the Mavericks’ organic reach. The only change Facebook has made has been to give posts that receive lots of negative feedback less distribution in the News Feed. As we shared with TechCrunch last week, highly engaging posts that don’t get negative feedback are actually getting more reach than ever before.

Reality: You can double your organic reach without spending a dime.

organic reach Fact Check: Why Mark Cuban is wrong about Facebook

Want to see this graph for your own Facebook Pages? Click here to try PageLever Now.

The graph above shows the Organic Reach of 9 different posts from the same Facebook Page. Take a look – the post represented by the grey line reached 68,768 people within the first 15 minutes of being published. By comparison, the post represented by the red line reached just 9,159 people. That’s a difference of 700%.

The lesson here is that Organic Reach is highly variable. We’ve been helping our customers reach more people through News Feed Optimization for years, and Mr. Cuban, if you’re reading this, we’ll help you too!

“Using Myspace Is Not As Crazy As You Think”

Reality: Yes, it is.

As of November 13th, MySpace has approximately 3.8 Million Monthly Active Users. By comparison, Facebook has over one billion.

Facebook has approximately 263x as many users as MySpace.

Brands don’t get to choose where people spend their time, and over one billion people have chosen to spend their time on Facebook. If Cuban chooses to focus the Dallas Mavericks’ attention on MySpace instead of Facebook, their marketing efforts will reach fewer people.

Twitter, Tumblr & MySpace

Cuban portrays Twitter, Tumblr and Instagram as paradise for brands:

“Twitter and Tumblr are both ready, willing and able to support brand activation without holding followers hostage for additional revenue. And in the ironic department, Instagram has the same friction-free reach to followers that Twitter and Tumblr have but Facebook doesn’t.”

What Cuban neglects to mention here is that neither Twitter nor Tumblr nor Instagram provide marketers with any insight into the number of people their content reaches. Literally none at all, and given the recent uproar over News Feed reach, I can’t exactly blame them – Facebook has to work tirelessly to educate marketers and advertisers about the metrics it provides.

In the absence of any data, Cuban and many others assume that they are reaching their entire audience on these networks, which is flat out wrong.

Reality: There is no utopia in social media.

No social network guarantees free, organic reach to all followers. Think about it from a user perspective for a second (something every marketer or advertiser should do more often):

Twitter, Tumblr and Instagram do not use any ranking algorithms to decide which content appears in users feeds – content is only ever sorted by recency. When you login to Twitter for the first time in 5 hours, you might scroll through the most recent 30-40 tweets, but if you’re following a few hundred people, you’re missing hundreds of tweets every day. Same with Tumblr, same with Instagram.

In practice, this means that the more people and brands that users follow on these networks, the less likely they are to see a given tweet, photo or post – there’s just too much content. This is true of every social network.

We’ve been through this before.

Experts have been writing about News Feed Optimization since 2007. But most marketers haven’t paid much attention, and until recently, assumed that they were reaching their entire audience for free. So now, instead of adapting to reality, folks like Cuban have chosen to make the same mistake on other platforms like Twitter, Tumblr and more.

When these platforms start providing analytics to brands, brands will be in for another shock. Many will get mad, point fingers like Cuban and threaten to leave.

And then we’ll do this song and dance all over again.

 

Announcing PageLever Now: The latest addition to the PageLever family


As you might have already heard, last Thursday we launched PageLever Now – the latest in our rapidly expanding suite of Facebook marketing products. Now is our solution for the first 48 hours of activity on your Facebook Pages.

Our goal with Now is to apply our expertise in analytics to the publishing and monitoring tools that you use everyday to get your job done. More than “just” a publisher, Now is a platform for apps that assist in every step of Facebook marketing, helping you make better decisions by presenting data you can act on.

The features you see in Now comes directly from our customers asking “It’d be great if I could…” or “I wish there was something that would help me…” We listened to your ideas and feedback.

Here’s what the press had to say about it:


thenextweb logo Announcing PageLever Now: The latest addition to the PageLever family

“The Next Web has found it invaluable. Knowing that when posts include an image, for example, it leads to a much higher engagement with readers is crucial for understanding what works and what doesn’t.”

mland Announcing PageLever Now: The latest addition to the PageLever family

“Indeed, the terminal-esque display is the reason that PageLever Now has so much potential for marketers as it is the first real-time post based analytics program.”

adweek logo Announcing PageLever Now: The latest addition to the PageLever family

“PageLever’s tools also plot a brand’s posts on a chart for at-a-glance looks at how each post’s reach has gone up or down in the last 48 hours.”


Read more press about the launch of PageLever Now →

Now is a big step towards our vision for the future of Facebook marketing – a future where marketers look at feedback from their audience, in the form of actionable data, before taking action, instead of using data as an afterthought.

Stay tuned for more announcements soon – we’re already hard at work on new features and tools to make PageLever even better. Many thanks to everyone who has supported us through the launch and shared in the excitement.

- Team PageLever

1 out of 5 new Facebook fans now comes from mobile–a 280% increase from May to August

Everyone wants to know how well Facebook is doing with mobile…

…so I just measured how many new fans the average Facebook page was getting from mobile.

New Facebook fans coming from mobile jumped 2.8x between May (5%) and August (19%)

Rather than just measuring “mobile fans,” I measured “mobile-fans-per-total-fans” to make sure these numbers weren’t affected by fluctuations in overall fan growth.

At the beginning of May, it was 5%. At the end of August it was 19%. That’s an increase of 2.8x in only four months!

mobile as percentage of total new fans 1 out of 5 new Facebook fans now comes from mobile  a 280% increase from May to August

To restate it to be extra clear: in May, out of every 100 new fans, the average Facebook page got 5 fans from mobile. By the end of August, the average page was getting 19 out of every 100 new fans from mobile.

It’s not clear to me why this jumped so fast. I checked with Facebook, and fans who come from ads targeted at mobile are included in this, since they came from a mobile device. According to Facebook, “If they became a fan through a mobile ad, then they would fall into both buckets. It would be attributed both to ‘mobile’ and ‘ads’ in the FQL table.

The dataset contained 500+ pages with 100K+ Facebook fans, so the results should be statistically robust. That said, this is just what we’re measuring across our customer base, and may be totally different than other pages on Facebook.

You can measure how many of your fans are coming from mobile by opening your PageLever account, going to Fans > Like Sources. Here’s an example screenshot from one of our demo pages:

PageLever Growth Sources 1024x506 1 out of 5 new Facebook fans now comes from mobile  a 280% increase from May to August

Milestone: We’re measuring over 1 billion connections between Pages and Facebook users

420885 10101718389550414 2072340652 n Milestone: Were measuring over 1 billion connections between Pages and Facebook users
This past Wednesday, Facebook announced that they’d hit the major milestone of one billion active users.

We were naturally curious how many connections between Facebook Pages and users we measure — as it turns out, we hit a big milestone ourselves on the same day:

As of October 4th, 2012, PageLever measures 1,101,504,623 connections between Pages and Facebook users.

Now, we don’t want to overstate our case — our number represents the total number of likes of all the Pages that we measure, not unique users on Facebook. Even still, one billion is a massive number of connections between Pages and users, and we were amazed to have hit it right at the same time as Facebook hit one billion active users.

In just 13 months since we launched, we’ve grown faster than we’d ever expected – kudos to our friends at MongoHQHeroku and of course, at Facebook for helping us scale our operations to the next level.

Most importantly, thank you to our customers for helping us reach this milestone – we do this for you, because we know what it’s like to be in your shoes. Thank you for your support, and we’re looking forward to building even better solutions for you over the next year as Facebook marketing continues to evolve and expand.

Here’s to the next billion users.

 

After Twitter pulls content from LinkedIn, referrals to FB pages spike 1000%

Before June 29th, 2012, you could connect your Twitter account to LinkedIn, and then when you tweeted, it’d go to both your Twitter followers and your LinkedIn followers. But the end of June, Twitter stopped allowing tweets to be syndicated directly into the LinkedIn newsfeed.

A lot of people, including me, wondered if the LinkedIn newsfeed would shrivel and die.

I asked Brian Carter to research how much traffic LinkedIn sent to 500+ Facebook pages that had between 100,000 and 1,000,000 fans.

The results were surprising–LinkedIn traffic spiked by 1000%!

linkedin referrals to facebook After Twitter pulls content from LinkedIn, referrals to FB pages spike 1000%

To be clear, LinkedIn wasn’t driving a lot of traffic in the first place, so it’s not that hard to spike by 10x.

But this does imply that more people read the LinkedIn newsfeed than I expected. It might be worth spending the time to copy/paste tweets and Facebook posts over to your followers on LinkedIn as well.

In fact, when I compared LinkedIn traffic to Google and Bing, LinkedIn now drives more traffic than the two of them combined:

linkedin vs google bing After Twitter pulls content from LinkedIn, referrals to FB pages spike 1000%

Driving with your eyes closed (PDF Whitepaper)

There’s something crazy going on in the world of Facebook marketing. There are thousands of people at brands and agencies working on Facebook Pages – generating content, managing communities, reporting to clients, managing teams. Entirely new businesses and departments have been founded to manage and grow companies’ social presence. Millions of people reached, and billions of impressions. And yet, most decisions are made on the basis of instinct alone. At the same companies, everyone else is judged quantitatively, using data. Search and display advertising. Finance. Even something as subjective as creative is subject to consumer surveys about brand recognition and sentiment. For these teams, it’s clear what success looks like, because it’s measured. But what does success look like for a Facebook Page? What does failure look like? When new hires are made, how is their work judged, and how do they demonstrate the impact of what they’ve achieved to their bosses and clients? How does the CEO know what’s working and what to invest in next? We think everyone managing Facebook Pages can benefit from actionable analytics, and the benefits are even greater for large teams and organizations. You probably already get it and see the benefits, but it’s not always easy to push everyone else to realize what they’re missing and convince them to do the right thing. To help you out, we put together this whitepaper to help explain how actionable data makes each person in the organization’s job easier. Sure, we’re biased, but we’ve witnessed first-hand how analytics drive companies towards the fast build, measure and learn cycle that’s essential to Facebook marketing.

Introduction

Facebook analytics didn’t used to be important, but they are now. In the early years of Facebook Pages, interns, new hires, and whoever was young and tech savvy managed brands’ social presence. They trusted their instincts about what was working and might work, and others rarely asked for reporting or accountability – sometimes the CEO or client would ask about how many Likes their Page had, but that was about it. These new people, with titles like “community manager” or “social media specialist” floated in-between PR, in-house marketing, account management – no one knew where to put them, or what questions to ask. With no one asking questions, and a huge first-mover advantage, there wasn’t a meaningful need for analytics for Facebook Pages. Fast-forward to 2012, and after five years of Facebook Pages, brands and agencies are starting to develop teams and departments dedicated to social. There’s finally some leadership and clients are demanding more. At the same time, Facebook marketing is getting harder, with more Pages and Apps competing for space in users News Feeds, and an increasing percentage of impressions happening on mobile devices. But despite the industry maturing, there’s still a huge problem — most companies don’t have any way to quantify success or failure on Facebook. The people who used to work in their own silo now have expectations, management to report to, clients that are asking more advanced questions, but decisions are still being made on the basis of intuition. Agencies and brands trust recent graduates to reach millions of people, but don’t give them the tools to get a competitive edge. CEOs push social marketing initiatives, but don’t have access to data to inform their decisions. Account managers don’t have tools to demonstrate success to their clients. Everyone, not just the person who is hands-on, needs analytics to succeed. We think the value of analytics grows exponentially as teams and companies grow, and there’s a place for analytics at every role in an organization. The better your team, the more they’ll thrive with meaningful and actionable goals defined by metrics and analytics. Let’s break down a few scenarios of how analytics help each person at a brand or agency succeed. At PageLever, we’ve seen this happen time and time again. As soon as brands and agencies make room for metrics next to intuition, it’s suddenly easy to identify and quantify success and failure, and take action right away.


The New Hire

“My boss said I’m in charge of managing this Facebook Page. I guess I’ll start Googling how to do that.”

Nearly everyone we’ve ever talked to who has been tasked with managing a Facebook Page has had to figure it out themselves. They turn to blogs, forums and Q&A sites to ask: “What type of content should I post most often?” “I heard that I should only post once a day, otherwise people will unlike the Page. Is that true?” “I saw another Page post a 1000-word message along with an image. Does this actually work?” Unfortunately, the flaw of blogs, forums and Q&A sites is that every Facebook Page is different. There is no magic bullet answer to read online, and what works for one Page is often terrible advice for another. There’s really no other industry where it’s acceptable to hire a new person, put them in a position where they can reach thousands of current and prospective customers, and have them rely on their ability to search for answers on Google to decide how to speak to this audience. Analytics are a learning tool for new hires. They show what has worked in the past and empower them to test new ideas and validate them with data. Giving new hires access to great analytics tools helps them demonstrate real, measurable success, which is crucial to employee retention and validating them as part of the team.


The Executive

“Social is integrated into everything we do, but I can’t see how well we’re actually doing.”

Nearly every business is now making social marketing and social media a focus. By this time, most CEOs have dealt with a few social media crises — an accidental tweet, a particularly loud and unhappy customer, or any short burst of customer outrage. Monitoring and sentiment analysis tools play into this fear and worry about what people are saying about the brand. But many executives are rarely exposed to the more meaningful, often positive metrics that show the long-term benefits of Facebook marketing. We think a big part of this is that most executives don’t have access to simple, actionable data. They can either get the full firehose or nothing. With this choice, it usually ends up being nothing ­— CEOs and VPs are busy people. The executive team deserves an executive summary of Facebook data, not just about a specific Page, but performance as a whole. How can we expect executives to be visionary and make smart investments in Facebook marketing if they don’t have access to data to inform their decisions?


The Director

“We need to hire another person, but I can’t justify the expense.”

Great community managers and social media experts are getting expensive. Look at any job board these days, and everyone is trying to hire for a postion that interns used to fill just a few years ago. Most directors we talk to wish they could hire a bigger team to develop richer social content and experiences, instead of spending all day posting, moderating and monitoring. But this is a qualitative argument, and business demands quantitative answers to questions like: Will a new hire help us to reach more people? Will a new hire help us get new business? Is Facebook really a big enough marketing channel for us to invest more in? Analytics help demonstrate how much is at stake, how much work goes into managing and growing a great Facebook Page, and where the pain points are that having an extra person would solve. Each organization tends to have a different social metric to justify new hires, based on the nature of their business. For some, like Pages representing retail brands, the metric is response time. How quickly are we responding to customer service issues coming in through Facebook and Twitter? For others, it’s about content. If there were more content, how much more frequently could we reach our audience? If we were able to increase the quality and virality of our content, how much more exposure could we get through people sharing it?


The Client

“How do I hold our agency accountable? Are they helping us make a big impact, or just following the herd?”

If you’re looking for outside help managing and growing your Facebook Pages, setting goals and expectations is essential if you want to get your money’s worth. While it’s the agency’s job to optimize for efficiency and scale, it’s your job to stay on them and make sure they’re getting you results. Too often, clients get burned by agencies who offload Facebook Pages to an intern, knowing that as long as something gets posted everyday, they’re off the hook. It’s time to start asking questions like: We talked through strategy last month — how do I look back and know if it’s actually working? We want to stand out and be different – are we making an impact on Facebook, or just following the same playbook that every other Page does? Since we hired you, how many more people are we reaching on Facebook every month? Are we getting negative feedback? How many people unlike us each week? How many friends of fans are we reaching, and how much conversation does this generate? Are we succeeding in getting people to talk about us? Relationships with agencies and consultants are built on trust, but have to be backed up by results that are clear and measurable. Up-to-date data should be easily accessible to clients and go beyond vanity metrics. Don’t get blinded by success theater – hold your partners accountable using data, so that you’re the one in the driver’s seat setting a high bar for goals and expectations.


The Creative

“Facebook is such a small format, it’s tough to tell what works.”

The creative director wanted a billboard, but has to work with a thumbnail image on Facebook. Yesterday she was working on a takeover campaign for ESPN, filled with animations and interactive content. Today she’s trying to come up with a campaign that can be squeezed down and still capture attention on an iPhone. And her deadline is tomorrow ­— the Page needs a steady stream of content, not the next big idea. While the industry has had time to develop best practices for creative in digital and interactive marketing, Facebook is relatively new and still changing rapidly. There aren’t rules and rubrics for what does or doesn’t work, and what worked six months ago may not work today. Creative people need data to focus their imagination on what works. At PageLever, we’ve seen lots of visually stunning images and videos fail on Facebook. Work that looks great and succeeds at capturing attention, but isn’t social and doesn’t drive users to take the next step of adding comments and sharing with their friends. Most often, this happens because the content was made in a bubble, and no one told the creative department what was already working on Facebook. By giving the copywriters and art directors the ability to understand which content already works, and allowing them to quickly test and validate ideas, it becomes easier to consistently generate social content that not only looks great, but fits with the user experience of the News Feed and Timeline.


The Account Manager

“My client asks for a report every week. I can’t keep up.”

Facebook has made life hard for account managers. The platform is always changing, regularly adding new features and creating new opportunities for marketers. As Pages and ads become more sophisticated, the need for efficient reporting tools will continue to grow. Most account managers can already automatically generate reports for search and display campaigns that are tailored to their clients needs, but they’re left in the dark when it comes to Facebook. Meanwhile, clients want to know exactly what is going on with their Page, asking questions like: How many new Likes did our Page get last week? How much of our audience are we reaching? Are the people we’re reaching on Facebook the same people we’re selling product to? A great Facebook analytics tool allows account mangers to choose exactly what metrics their clients can access, save the time of manually generating reports in Excel, and make clients smile. At PageLever, we’ve met many incredibly bright account managers who are bogged down making data look pretty, when they could be taking on new accounts and spending time with their clients. It’s time to give account managers the tools they deserve, so that they can do their job and make sure clients are confident, happy, and most importantly, renew their contract next year.


Summary

Analytics are for everyone.

Analytics aren’t just for the end-user. While only one person might be hands-on with a Facebook Page, many more people are responsible for the health and success of the organization. Metrics and data help people make smart decisions all the way up the chain of command. Use analytics to make your case internally. Facebook is such a new platform that it’s not always easy to justify new hires or pull time away from expensive designers and developers. But numbers don’t lie, and can help you argue for the resources you need to do great work. Set quantiative goals that augment your qualitative instincts. It’s essential to understand what success looks like on Facebook, in order to replicate it. Qualitative judgements are great for coming up with hypothesis, but they’re only proven once validated by data. Build, measure and learn. Every amazing Facebook marketing team runs small experiments in order to test their ideas at a small scale, and then uses metrics to understand which aspects worked. Was it the call to action? The image? The timing? Then they take this learning and go bigger, backed by the confidence of knowing that their ideas have already seen initial success.

Older posts Newer posts

© 2014

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑